Whistleblowers have come forward with allegations that could profoundly impact the narrative surrounding the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump.
According to The Post Millennial on Monday, July 22, 2024, as per these whistleblowers, law enforcement personnel were allegedly scheduled to be stationed on the roof of the building from which gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks opened fire.
However, these personnel abandoned their posts on the day of the attack, reportedly due to concerns over the extreme heat.
Senator Josh Hawley, a vocal supporter of Trump and a prominent figure in conservative circles, has been at the forefront of bringing these revelations to light.
During a press conference, Hawley disclosed that multiple whistleblowers from within law enforcement agencies had contacted his office with detailed accounts of the events leading up to the attempted assassination.
According to these sources, there was a clear directive for officers to be positioned on the rooftop as a precautionary measure to provide a strategic vantage point and enhance security.
The attack, which occurred in Pennsylvania, involved Thomas Matthew Crooks, who opened fire from an elevated position, targeting Trump during a campaign event.
The incident has already raised significant concerns about security protocols and the effectiveness of law enforcement in protecting high-profile political figures.
The new information from whistleblowers adds another layer of complexity to the unfolding investigation.
Senator Hawley has called for an immediate and thorough investigation into the circumstances that led to the abandonment of the rooftop post.
“The American people deserve to know why critical security measures were not in place and why personnel abandoned their posts at a time when they were needed the most,” Hawley stated.
He emphasized the need for accountability and transparency, suggesting that the abandonment of the rooftop post may have contributed to the success of Crooks’ attack.
The whistleblowers’ claims are particularly troubling given the importance of rooftop surveillance in providing a tactical advantage and early detection of potential threats.
Abandoning such a post, especially during a high-risk event, raises questions about decision-making processes and the prioritization of security measures.
According to the whistleblowers, the law enforcement personnel involved cited the extreme heat as the primary reason for leaving their posts.
On the day of the attack, temperatures reportedly soared to over 90 degrees Fahrenheit, creating challenging working conditions.
Critics of Senator Hawley have accused him of using the incident to further his political agenda, suggesting that his focus on the whistleblower revelations is an attempt to undermine confidence in law enforcement agencies.
However, Hawley has dismissed these accusations, insisting that his primary concern is ensuring the safety and security of political figures and the public.
The allegations come at a time when the nation is already deeply divided over issues of law enforcement, security, and political violence.
The attempted assassination of a former president is an unprecedented event in modern American history, and the emerging details from whistleblowers add a new dimension to the ongoing discourse.
