In the latest development of the legal saga surrounding former President Donald Trump, his request for the Supreme Court to halt the D.C. Circuit’s ruling against his immunity claim in the federal election conspiracy case has stirred significant speculation and analysis. As reported by Raw Story on Monday, February 12, 2024, Trump’s suggestion that the Supreme Court should hold off if the D.C. Circuit decides to rehear the case en banc, involving the entire judicial body on the circuit, has sparked curiosity and raised questions about the feasibility of such a scenario.
Former federal judge Nancy Gertner shared her insights on the matter during an interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper, shedding light on the potential implications of Trump’s legal tactics.
During the interview, Cooper asked Gertner about the likelihood of the entire D.C. appeals court overturning the three-judge panel’s ruling on immunity. Gertner’s response was clear: “Extremely unlikely.”
She elaborated that the considerable time taken by the three-judge panel to reach their decision likely indicated careful consideration to ensure unanimity not only within the panel but also among the broader D.C. Circuit.
Gertner’s analysis suggests that the three-judge panel probably took significant steps to prevent any disagreement within the D.C. Circuit, thus eliminating the need for a full-court review.
She speculated that the panel might have circulated their decision among all the circuit judges to strengthen its validity and preempt any potential challenges.
This thorough approach highlights the seriousness of the decision and the effort made to ensure its legal integrity.
Additionally, Gertner dismissed the idea of a significant delay resulting from a possible full-court review, noting that the panel’s meticulous deliberations likely minimized the chance of prolonged legal proceedings.
Her assessment indicates that any further review by the entire D.C. Circuit would likely proceed promptly, considering the exhaustive examination already conducted by the three-judge panel.
Gertner’s insights shed light on the intricate workings of the judicial system and the careful handling of legal processes, particularly in high-profile cases like Trump’s immunity claim.
Her analysis underscores the complexity of navigating the legal landscape and the importance of strategic decision-making in influencing legal outcomes.
